Mount Rushmore Frankist Freemasons

More pieces of the puzzle are starting to fall into place about the Sabeans.

I know – you have no idea who ‘the Sabeans’ are…

I wrote quite a lot about them a few weeks ago, but all our brains are so fried-out, it’s hard to retain information. So HERE is where you can read the whole article, and below I’ll excerpt some relevant snippets.

(I’m learning that if I keep repeating things 400 times, eventually some of the information sticks enough to be internalised.)


Snippet 1:

The Druze are known to have had some close interactions with a group of idol worshipers who maintained a lot of ancient occult knowledge from Egypt, known as the Sabians.

There is evidence that the first Templars in the Middle East – a very small, elite group of 9 wealthy knights – went to these Sabians in Harran before they did anything else, to try to learn more of their ‘occult’ ancient Egyptian knowledge, on the direct orders of Bernard of Clairveaux.


Snippet 2:

While I was re-reading the post The Real Roots of the Illuminati, I noticed a reference to the Sabians,who the Knights Templar went to ‘learn’ from, when they conquered the Holy Land.

(Remember, the Knights Templar morphed into the Freemasons, and the other orders of ‘xtian’ Knights in the holy land like the Hospitallers also morphed into a bunch of secret societies that aren’t called ‘freemasons’ but act in the same sort of way.)


I went to look up more about these Sabians, and here’s what I learned (from Wikipedia):

The Sabians were identified by early writers with the ancient Jewish Christian group the Elcesaites, and with gnostic groups such as the Hermeticists and the Manichaens.

According to Daniel Chwolson‘s exhaustive survey of Islamic and other sources (1856), they appear to have gravitated around the original pro-Jewish Hanputa of the Elcesaites, from which the prophet Mani seceded. These Hanip Sabians are later identified as the pro-Torah Sampsaeans.


Snippet 3:

The more I look into what’s going on here, the more I’m coming to the conclusion that the Frankists, and the Sabbateans before them, and the Spanish Alumbrados before them, are just the latest in a long line of externally ‘Judeo-Xtian’ messianic groups that are ‘anti’ the Torah, and who have actually been in existence for at least 2,000 years – if not longer.

Frank was just the latest figurehead, or ‘reincarnation’ for this group of people who have been pretending to be Jews, and pretending to be xtians for 2000 years – but really are not.


Snippet 4:


  • The Sabians have ancient pagan (devil-worshipping…) roots, that go all the way back to Ancient Egypt, and they consider ‘Aram’ (probably Lavan / Bilaam) as their direct ancestor.

  • Sabians are the sworn enemy of the Jews and Judaism, and they see God and religious Jews as being ‘evil’.

  • Sabians are a proto ‘Judeo-Xtian’ group, that splintered out of early xtianity 2,000 years ago – but evidently, have done a marvelous job of ‘assimilating’ in and out of the Muslim, Xtian and Jewish populations, as it suits them.

  • There is a direct connection between the Sabians and the Knights Templar, who went on to found Freemasonry, and also links to the other secret societies.

  • I have a very strong suspicion that the Sabbatean-Frankists were actually just the latest in a long line of Jew and Torah-hating Sabians, who were trying to speed up the destruction of Judaism (God forbid) by operating from within the Jewish community.

  • The Sabians are probably one and the same as the klippat de’Tarmodai. 

  • Whoever was funding Jacob Frank’s movement – the ‘Baalakebens’ – were demonically-inspired. And they very well might have been based in the Baalabek area, which is on the border between the modern State of Israel and Lebanon, which has a big Druze population.


Go back and read the other post, it will fill in the gaps and help you to understand how I got to these ‘takeaway points’ above.

Because now, we are going to add in some new information that came to light a couple of days ago, written by Chananya Weissman.

(I actually read Weissman’s posts on the Tomer Devorah blog, and left a comment there linking to the post I wrote about the Sabeans, quoted above, which she decided to censor. I think it’s because I support the Rav, Rav Berland. It’s chaval that so many people got duped by the media lies…. what can we do.)


You can read Chananya Weissman’s full post HERE, and below is the relevant snippet:

Chazal teach us that Chizkiyahu did six controversial things, three of which received the approval of the Sages and three of which did not (Pesachim 56A). The three which received approval all countered avoda zara: he dragged the bones of his father, an idolater, on a bed of rope, he pulverized the copper snake that Moshe fashioned (Bamidbar Chapter 21) which the Jews later began to worship, and he hid away the book of cures.

The latter is most intriguing. Rashi explains that people used this book of cures (which the Ramban in his introduction to Bereishis attributes to Shlomo Hamelech) to heal immediately, and they didn’t humble their hearts. Chizkiyahu hid it to compel the people to turn to Hashem.

The Rambam vehemently rejects this explanation (see his Pirush Hamishnayos). He suggests that the book of cures might have contained information about how to prepare various poisons from plants, what illnesses they would cause, and how to cure them. When Chizkiyahu saw that this scientific information was being used to murder people, he hid the book.

However, the Rambam’s preferred explanation appears in Moreh Nevuchim Part 3 Chapter 37.

There he writes that the book of cures was based on the idolatrous ideology of the Sabeans, which dated back to the times of Avraham.

This ideology was dominant at the time; it combined nature-worship, star-worship, and sexual perversity. Their cultish behaviors were not merely religion, but the accepted science of the time. Consequently, one who veered from their behaviors was considered a heretic, a science-denier, and a threat to society. The Rambam is adamant that the cures in the book were idolatrous and fraudulent.


Hey, looky there!

It’s those ‘Sabeans’ again – the ‘Big Pharma’ of the ancient world.

Do you think it’s a CO-IN-CID-ENCE that we fingered these same antinomian, Jew-hating Sabeans as being the spiritual moving force behind the Sabbateans, the Frankists and the Freemasons, and now we see that none other than the Rambam calls them out for also being the ‘idolatrous and fraudulent’ Big Pharma of the ancient world?

There is nothing new under the sun.


We are dealing with the same people, the same evil, idolatrous beliefs, the same modus operandi that our forefathers have been dealing with for at least the last 3,333 years.

How could it be otherwise?

We are on the cusp of geulah, and on the cusp of moshiach being openly revealed (clue: it’s definitely not Jonathan Pollard).

So of course, the same tests of murder, idol worship and immorality are coming around again.


That was the test of the times of the First Temple – that we failed badly.

And the test of the times of the Second Temple was sinat chinam – hating our fellow Jew in our hearts, instead of internalising that everything and everyone is really just a message, a manifestation of God.

And we failed that test really badly, too.

But now, thanks to the COVID scamdemic (which is being engineered by the modern-day incarnations of those ancient Sabians, the Frankist-Freemasons, who are at the highest levels of the (pretend…) Jewish world) – well.

God is giving us another chance to pass the test, before Moshiach comes.

And hopefully, we’ll do a much better job, this time around.


PS: In case you were wondering how the picture of Mount Rushmore relates to this post…

I was scanning for pictures of the ‘Ancient World’ when it came up next to pictures of Sphinxes and ‘Buddhas’ and other idolatrous idols, like this:


Compare and contrast:

Mount Rushmore Frankist Freemasons


America’s presidents are deep in the Frankist-Freemason network.

There is nothing new under the sun.


You might also like these articles:

4 replies
  1. Ana
    Ana says:

    I don’t want to get involved in whatever historical “beef” there is, but I just want to point out that your comment does appear on the TomerDevorah Blog, but under the previous post about “The World Council of Religious Leaders – One Tip of the Iceberg” and not on the post containing what you quoted from Rabbi Weissman.

    It’s really important to realize that we’re all on “the same team” and to do our best to bring Shalom and dan l’kaf zechut, etc… maybe your post was moved or accidentally posted on the wrong thing? I don’t know, but it certainly doesn’t appear that you’re being censored wholesale:
    Rivka Levy said…
    The link with the Sabeans is fascinating.

    I wrote this about the Sabeans a few weeks’ back, and their connections to Frankists and Freemasonry – a lot of the pieces of the puzzle are starting to fall into place:

    14/4/21 1:22 PM

    • Rivka Levy
      Rivka Levy says:

      Thanks for the reminder that we are all on the same side – and for finding the comment. Very strange, that it ended up there, but I’m very pleased to know it was a glitch and not anything else.

      • Ana
        Ana says:

        Does this reverse your comment about Jonathan Pollard being mashaich? 🙂

        Seriously, though, if there is a mashiach ben Yosef and a mashiach ben David, then this shouldn’t necessarily bother you, should it?


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
6 + 29 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.