14 European countries just suspended the Astra-Zeneca / ‘Oxford’ Covid shot.
***Important Updates, scroll down***
I was telling this to my brother, who lives in the UK, when he told me yeah, it’s strange, because the Pfizer shot had even more dangerous blood clots associated with it in the UK, but no-one has suspended that brand.
I didn’t know that Pfizer’s Covid 19 shot was being reported in the UK as having a higher level of adverse reactions, including serious blood clots, than the Astra Zeneca shot.
But of course, that comes as no surprise.
I live in Israel, and the last thing the government or media here wants to do is to give anyone any real information about what’s really happening around these shots.
But I went to track it down, and sure enough, I found this:
Here’s a few snippets:
[D]ata from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) regulator in the UK show more people have reported blood clots after having Pfizer’s vaccine than the Oxford one — even though Pfizer’s jab has not been suspended anywhere.
“Breaking the silence on the decision to suspend use of the jab, Germany’s Paul Ehrlich Institute said the condition is ‘so serious that it is not justifiable to continue vaccinating without testing‘. UK’s drug regulators appear to have spotted the condition five times in 11million doses — but have yet to comment on Germany’s figures.
14 European countries including Germany, Spain and Italy have now ‘suspended’ the Astra Zeneca shot.
I have no idea what’s really going on, but this I do know:
We aren’t being told the truth.
These countries aren’t suspending the shot because of some rare blood clots.
The ‘rare blood clots’ are a red herring, to take the public’s eye off the real story, which is this:
14 European countries have stopped ‘vaccinating’ their citizens with the experimental gene therapy that most of Israel’s adults have now had.
The reason they are giving – publically – is that it is not justifiable to continue vaccinating without testing.
But they aren’t really talking about rare blood clots.
Here in Israel, no-one is reporting anything about this.
Of course not.
We are ‘Ground Zero’ for this grand Covid 19 experimental gene therapy, and the results of that great experiment aren’t due in for a few more weeks – and months, and years.
My neighbor just told me that she will be ‘banned’ from completing the last semester of her 4 year degree at Shalem if she doesn’t come back to school after Pesach vaccinated.
Other people are being ‘banned’ from attending weddings, unless they can show a ‘green passport’ (or lie about it…)
Another woman I met yesterday told me Hadassah said they will ‘furlough’ any staff member who refuses to be ‘vaccinated’.
So of course, she obliged.
It’s hard to hang on.
The madness is so overwhelming sometimes.
Yesterday, I had a migraine all day, just from worrying about where all this is going.
Then, I realised I have to let this go.
I have to turn off the computer now for a few days, and get down to my Pesach cleaning.
Because Nissan is the month of open miracles.
And I am totally unprepared.
The following comes from HERE.
Like you, I don’t know if there is a ‘lack’ of adverse effects to the Pfizer shot in Israel because:
- They just aren’t happening.
- They aren’t happening – yet.
- They ARE happening, but they aren’t being reported on.
Only time will tell.
But in the meantime, I found this interesting:
United Kingdom: 12 people deaf, five blind after Pfizer BioNTech mRNA shots
Here’s a snippet:
The U.K.’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is the functional equivalent of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA…
MHRA published a report on February 11 summarizing the self-reported adverse effects to Pfizer BioNTech and Oxford-Astra Zeneca shots from December 9, 2020 to January 31, 2021. The usual suspects, like anaphylaxis (120), Bell’s Palsy (99) and death (66), show up in the report. But some new adverse reactions have surfaced that even this blogger has not seen until now…
Twelve people reported going deaf after receiving the Pfizer BioNTech shots…
Meanwhile five people reported going blind after receiving the mRNA shot.
You can see the MHRA’s full report HERE.
I’m also trying to find how many doses of Pfizer’s shot have been delivered in the UK, to date.
Again, it’s very hard tracking that information down easily.
Here‘s what I’ve found so far, dated January 5th:
So far, more than a million people in the U.K. have already been vaccinated with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, according to the government, and some, like the first ever recipient of that vaccine outside of a clinical trial, have received their second dose.
When I have more time, I’ll see if I can find more up-to-date details, so then we can make more of a comparison with the adverse reactions being reported in the UK, and those (not…) being reported in Israel.
And here is some of the information being collated in Europe:
The European Medicines Agency maintains a database of suspected adverse drug reactions that is accessible to the general public (see box for “Healthcare professionals, patients and the general public”). Under the letter “C,” Covid-19 reports can be generated for the Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca injections.
As of February 23, 2021, EudraVigilance had received over 71,000 suspected adverse reaction reports for the Pfizer injection, almost 9,000 for the AstraZeneca injection, and over 2,500 for the Moderna injection.
Hey, guess what?
They have got rid of that page now, on the EU website:
I’d love to tell you where you can find similar information on adverse reactions for Israel – but of course, nobody knows.
If the information on ‘adverse reactions’ here is even being compiled (big if…) it’s certainly not being shared with the public.
Even if you still believe all this is being done in good will by the Israeli government, doesn’t that strike you as odd?
I managed to find the EU report on ‘Cominarty’ – the brand name of Pfizer’s Covid 19 mRNA shot, HERE.
It’s 120 pages long, but I’m working my way through it, and I’ll be updating this post as I find interesting things that you can go and check out for yourself.
Like this, on page 19:
In GLP toxicity studies, two variants of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine candidate were
tested, designated “variant 8” and “variant 9” (V8 and V9, respectively)….
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (V9) was evaluated clinically and submitted for application.
Two GLP-compliant repeat-dose toxicity studies were performed in Wistar Han rats; one
with each variant. Both studies were 17 days in duration with a 3-week recovery period.
A DART study in Wistar Han rats has been completed. Safety pharmacology, genotoxicity and
carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted, in accordance with the 2005 WHO vaccine guideline.
Hey, wait a minute…
Why wasn’t this experimental Covid 19 mRNA shot being tested for ‘safety pharmacology, genotoxicity and carcinogenecity?’
The footnote ‘explaining’ why Cominarty wasn’t tested for these things points to this, on the WHO website, dated 2005:
It’s another 36 page document… lucky I read fast.
On Pg 20 (just after a long description of how carefully ‘new vaccines’ should be tested in pregnant animals before being tried on pregnant human beings – something that was totally skipped with ‘Cominarty’) it says this:
3 Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies
Genotoxicity studies are normally not needed for the final vaccine formulation….
Carcinogenicity studies are not required for vaccine antigens…
4.2.4 Safety pharmacology
The purpose of safety pharmacology is to investigate the effects of the candidate vaccine on vital functions. If data from nonclinical and/or human clinical studies suggest that the vaccine (e.g. one based on specific toxoids) may affect physiological functions (e.g. central nervous system, respiratory, cardiovascular and renal functions) other than those of the immune system, safety pharmacology studies should be incorporated into the toxicity assessment.
Here’s a PUBMED definition of ‘genotoxicity’:
A genotoxin is a chemical or agent that can cause DNA or chromosomal damage. Such damage in a germ cell has the potential to cause a heritable altered trait (germline mutation). DNA damage in a somatic cell may result in a somatic mutation, which may lead to malignant transformation (cancer).
Feel reassured tho, that Cominarty – and all the experimental gene therapies – WEREN’T TESTED FOR THIS AT ALL, before being rolled out to millions of people worldwide.
And they also weren’t tested to see how they “may affect physiological functions (e.g. central nervous system, respiratory, cardiovascular and renal functions.)
So all those people with Cominarty-induced Bells Palsy – feel reassured!!!
No-one apparently tested any of this stuff to see how these mRNA gene therapies might also affect your central nervous system.
Back to the EU report on ‘Cominarty’
On page 58, we find this:
This says that pregnant and breast-feeding women were excluded from the trial, because:
Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Reason for exclusion: To avoid use in a vulnerable population…
It is not known if maternal vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccine would have unexpected negative consequences to the embryo or foetus.
No tests, of any type, animal or otherwise, were performed to reverse this ‘lack’ of information, yet the Health Ministry in Israel decided that it’s now totally ‘safe’ to inject pregnant women here with Cominarty.
But don’t worry!
On page 66, they tell us this:
The safety profile of the vaccine is not known in pregnant or breastfeeding women due to their exclusion from the pivotal clinical study.
Accordingly, maternal COVID-19 impact to either embryo or foetus is also not known.
It is important to obtain long term follow-up on women who were pregnant at or around the time of vaccination so that any potential negative consequences to the pregnancy can be assessed and weighed against the effects of maternal COVID-19 on the pregnancy.
I.E, the pregnant women in Israel – and their unborn children – are 100% guinea pigs in this human experiment.
Let’s stop here.
I could go on and on and on.
But who’s even listening anymore?
Most of Israel – plus my mum – got ‘vaccinated’, and now they just want to go back to normal and forget all about this.
I’m just not so sure God’s going to agree.
I found the ‘adverse reactions’ report for the Pfizer shot in Europe now, under a different brand name called TOZINAMERAN. Go HERE, to see it for yourself.
Here’s a screenshot:
It shows that by 13th March, 2021, there were 102,100 ‘adverse reaction’ reports to the jab, including 69,000 reported by healthcare professionals.
Or to put that another way, 69,000 people had ‘reactions’ that were serious enough for them to speak to a ‘healthcare professional’ about them.
And there were 32 instances of an ‘adverse reaction’ to the shot in infants less than one month old.
Someone please explain how that is possible.
Are they injecting newborns?
Or are these newborns being ‘affected’ by the shots given to their [formerly…] pregnant mothers?
Here‘s the screenshot for the AstraZeneca shot:
It shows 54,571 adverse reactions by March 13th, 2021.
Go HERE, to see the figures for the Moderna jab.
By way of contrast, here are some ‘adverse reaction’ screenshots for other vaccines, so you can get a feel for what’s really going on here.
This is for the measles jab (live):
548 adverse reactions, by 13th March, 2021.
And this is for the MMR shot (live):
10,509 adverse reactions, by March 13th, 2021.
And last but not least, the flu shot (live attenuated nasal):
2,496 ‘adverse reactions’ by March 13, 2021.
Still think your ‘Covid 19’ jab is so safe?
And this is just the initial, short term adverse reactions.
You might also like this article: