After that 5G lamp-post showed up next to my house, something seems to have ‘clicked’ in my head.
I am no longer prepared to ‘tip-toe’ around this subject with those people who prefer to keep their heads in the sand, and / or who keep pushing masks and biotoxic jabs on others without doing their due diligence first.
So, two days’ ago, I decided to send that 8 hour FDA discussion about the dangers associated with the Pfizer shot to a few people on the other side of this discussion.
One is my former friend, who pointedly told me I couldn’t come to her family wedding unless I was fully-vaccinated (thus outdoing even the ridiculous restrictions of the government’s Green Pass).
And who spent the whole year ‘judging me’ for being anti-mask and anti-‘vaccine’ without doing a single second of her own research into verifying if my concerns about the Pfizer shot might be true.
And the other is a well-meaning blogger who believes, mamash, in the efficacy of vaccinations, and also believes still that these experimental gene therapy shots act in exactly the same was as a traditional vaccine.
I’m still waiting for the friend to pass comment, but in the meantime, here’s my email exchange with the blogger:
There is verifiable information that the Pfizer shot is killing two people for everyone it ‘saves’ from Covid 19.
He responded with this:
Hi Rivka,The VAERS database is voluntary open reporting. You could submit a report.The VAERS database also says 50,000 people are dying each year in the US from… Tylenol.I assume you are not in Israel. Israel’s medical reporting is tightly controlled and centralized, with doctor and hospital activity and test results automatically creating statistics and reports.In Israel 1/3 of the population, mostly over age 40, has received the 3rd dose of Pfizer (that’s around 15,000,000 doses, 3,000,000 of dose #3).There are 2 confirmed deaths from Pfizer in Israel by the official system, and an unofficial tracking tracking group that said it is under reported was able to document around 60 (deaths who’s timing is highly suspect).==
By the way, while Israel’s reports of total cases per population is higher than the US, Israel’s reports of Corona fatalities is 1/2 of the US.Is that due to better / tighter reporting, higher standards for not “a person died and they had Corona – it’s a Corona death” versus “a person died of Corona”, or is Israel doing something better in treating – I can’t say.The FDA, CDC, and WHO have not been reliable sources of decisions or data around Corona. And the whole thing is so hyper politicized in the US that it is impossible to get a good picture or make good decisions.==
Not all of Israels decisions have been good, and they have even screwed up their data reporting a couple of times.But they actually publish their raw data and you can analyze it yourself:The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are much more safe than the disease for anyone over age 12, and certainly for anyone over age 40.==An example I’ve used a few times:I had a friend who would NOT wear a car seat belt… because they had a family member who had died in a car fire after an accident being unable to remove their seat belt.While it is absolutely true that a car seat belt may jam in an accident, and if there is a fire that can be deadly – the other 99.999% of the time the seat belt will save from major injury.Vaccines, ALL VACCINES, have side effects and, very rarely, deadly effects. But for everything we vaccinate for, the diseases have much much much much much higher rates of negative effects and deadly effects.The risk : reward ratio says, like wearing a car seat, vaccinate.
Again, let me stress here that I have great respect for this individual, while totally disagreeing with his opinions on Covid 19 ‘vaccines’.
I’ve been going through the database you sent me the link for this afternoon, as this is what the stats show:
Number of partially and fully vaccinated people hospitalised with Covid 19 since the beginning of the third shot:
Number of unvaccinated people hospitalised with Covid 19 since the beginning of the third shot:
Number of partially and fully vaccinated (3 doses) people who died since the beginning of the third shot in Israel:
Number of unvaccinated people who died since the beginning of the third shot in Israel:
These are the numbers assuming that all ‘non-vaccinated’ people are totally non-vaccinated, and that they aren’t being classified as ‘non-vaccinated’ because they only had one or now two shots; nor that they were within 2 weeks of receiving a vaccine dose.
And even so – these numbers are showing that the vaccine is making very little difference to the number of lives being saved, and also the number of people being hospitalised for Covid 19.
This is just not adding up to me.
I just read THIS explanatory document about the deaths and hospitalisations.
I.e. the people in the ‘unvaccinated’ column can also include individuals who recieved their first corona vaccine dose the day before being hospitalised.
You’ve run into a common statistical misunderstanding.
If 1,000 people are in car accidents and 100 are injured, 5 of the injured wearing seat belts and 5 of the injured not wearing seat belts – you might see that and think, wearing a seat belt didn’t make any difference.
But out of that 1,000 people, 900 were wearing seatbelts and 100 were not. Therefore 5% of non-seat-belt-wearers are injured, but only 0.6% of seat belt wearers were injured.
Our statistical problem with vaccination is the same, but even more complicated.
In general, I think it’s 80% of the population that is 2 dose vaxxed, and now 33% of the population is 3 dose vaxxed.
But, the percentage of vaxx level is very different by age. So we need to look at vaxx levels by age versus serious cases by age / vaxx status, to determine if the vaccines are making a difference.
At the start of Delta, the statistics showed they were NOT making a difference EXCEPT in ages 20 or less! Which makes little sense. Either the vaccines were only effective on young immune systems (or that was the case for Delta because that was not true for UK) OR they were not effective on older people because of when they were vaccinated.
More research showed it was WHEN they were vaccinated (by checking people who were getting sick against their date of vaccination).
That’s why they started the 3rd vaxx campaign.
So if 90% of people aged 80+ are vaccinated, and there are 100 serious cases in that age category, and 50 of those are vaxxed and 50 of those are not vaxxed — we see that vaxx status is 9x protective against serious illness.
And related to the email you sent while I was writing this, we also have the problem that counting a vaxx status too soon also means it’s not yet fully protective.
2 weeks after dose 3 to full protection.
Let’s just digress, a minute, to deal with this misleading seatbelt analogy.
If we do some research, and we see that fewer people were thrown through the windscreen because they were wearing a seatbelt – ok yes, we can draw the conclusion that the seatbelt is preventing people from being thrown through the windscreen.
If we do more research, and we see that while the seatbelt prevented people from being thrown through the windscreen – but is actually built in such a way that it’s strangling a percentage of people to death in their seats when they crash.
That changes the whole picture, doesn’t it?
If the seatbelt itself is causing deaths and injuries, the whole cost-benefit analysis of wearing one has to be carefully re-appraised.
Here’s what I replied to him:
2 weeks after dose 3 to full protection.Is based on what real science?
Can you point me to any research paper that states this?From what I can see, they still can’t say what the true incubation time is for Corona. If it’s two weeks, then why is the bidud time down to a week?Also, what is meant to happen between doses to give ‘full protection’?If the third dose is exactly the same as the first two, how is this meant to be protecting someone from a variant like Delta?
He came back with this:
First, here’s a step by step explanation of the statistical problem: https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/israeli-data-how-can-efficacy-vs-severe-disease-be-strong-when-60-of-hospitalized-are-vaccinatedThe study was out of Sheba hospital. All I am finding is the final result, it was 10x improvement. But when the info was first out, they mentioned they were sampling daily and when the numbers went up and maximized.Found it – 12 days — https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.27.21262679v1
Ministry of Health spokespeople and vaccine-pushers extraordinaire, Sharon Alroy-Preis and Nachman Ash!
We defined dynamic cohorts where individuals initially belong to the ‘non-booster’ cohort, leave it when receiving the booster dose and join the ‘booster’ cohort 12 days later. Rates of infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes per person-days at risk were compared between the cohorts using Poisson regression, adjusting for possible confounding factors.
Ok, I’ll take a look.
But then how do we explain this, by a clinical statistician who presumably understands how stats work, and is basing his findings 100% on data from the Israeli ministry of health?
“More severe COVID19 cases among vaccinated than unvaccinated Israeli, July 1-August12 2021 Hervé Seligmann Aug17-2021 V3 All data and figures are from the Israel Health Ministry website, קורונה – לוחבקרה) health.gov.il), accessed 12VIII2021.”
It contains the first-hand testimonies of literally tens of ordinary Israelis, men and women, who have had their health seriously impacted by the Pfizer shot, or even seen close relatives die as a result of the Pfizer shot.
So, back to the stats.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window. How convenient
Anyone who dies within the first 14 days post-injection is counted as an unvaccinated death.
Not only does this inaccurately inflate the unvaccinated death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the COVID shots, as the vast majority of deaths from these shots occur within the first two weeks
The CDC also has two different sets of testing guidelines — one for vaccinated patients and another for the unvaccinated. If you’re unvaccinated, CDC guidance says to use a cycle threshold (CT) of 40, known to result in false positives. If you’re vaccinated, they recommend using a CT of 28 or less, which minimizes the risk of false positives
The CDC also hides vaccine failures and props up the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative by only counting breakthrough cases that result in hospitalization or death
Hospitals are still also reporting non-COVID related illnesses as COVID-19
And of course, the Ministry of Health in Israel is also using its own unique brand of dirty tricks with the stats linked to above.
Here’s how Israel’s Ministry of Health is totally distorting the data about how Pfizer shots are causing multiple deaths and serious illnesses in Israel:
1. Playing with the definition of “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated”.[T]here are at least 3 definitions in the Ministry of Health of who is considered “unvaccinated”.
In this slide the definition of “vaccinated” is a person who received two doses and seven days passed since the second dose.
People who died from corona or from the vaccine itself in the period between the first dose and up to 7 days after the second dose are not counted at all.Also, those who recovered and had one dose are not counted at all.==
A second definition of who is considered “vaccinated” according to the experts of the Ministry of Health can be found in their dashboard.
This time the “vaccinated” are those who were vaccinated with a second dose and 7 days have passed.And in addition, those who have recovered and been vaccinated with one dose and have passed 7 days since the same dose.====What is the judgment of those “bad students” who did not recover but were vaccinated by only one dose and did not come to be vaccinated for the second dose?
In which group does the Ministry of Health place them?And what about those who received a placebo and do not even know it but only the Ministry of Health knows who they are?And what about those who recovered and were vaccinated by one dose and were injured before 7 days had passed since receiving the injection?All of these are undefined patients numbering in the hundreds of thousands and allowing the Ministry of Health to drop numbers and transfer according to the picture it wants to present the morbidity from the camp of the vaccinated to the camp of the unvaccinated.By transferring them to the unvaccinated group when they become infected / dead from COVID19, the Ministry of Health can give a false representation of a high morbidity rate in the unvaccinated.
2. Hiding vaccinated mortality data
(Again go HERE for the full explanation and charts and data, I’m just picking out the highlights for this post.)
The vaccinated have no advantage over the unvaccinated, but unfortunately they also suffered high mortality in the days after the injections as well as the side effects caused by Pfizer and Moderna, heart attacks, strokes and other troubles, in addition to a weakened immune system.
They have a much higher mortality rate than in the non-vaccinated as we will see below, i.e. it can be said that the “vaccinated” lost on both sides.
In additional graphs provided by Dr. Seligmann, analysis of data from the Ministry of Health’s dashboard from July to August 12 shows that the percentage of critically ill patients among the vaccinated increases at a higher rate than among the unvaccinated, Dr. Seligmann concludes that vaccination does not prevent severe cases and even worse, encourages serious illness …
There is WAY more distortion and deception going on with the Health Ministry’s stats, and Dr Herve Seligman does a great job of breaking it down.
But I want to end with this last snippet:
And now for the icing on the cake, Dr. Haim Sadowski reports on Facebook that he contacted a trusted source in the Ministry of Health who passed him the real mortality data of the vaccinated versus the non-vaccinated and this time without distortion and without the manipulations described above.
For people who don’t read Hebrew, the column on the furthest left, in both the pink and the yellow data sets, is the number of people who died from ‘Corona’, who WEREN’T vaccinated.
And the column next to that is the number who died who WERE vaccinated.
In July (pink) before they began the third shot in earnest, 44 vaccinated people died ‘from Covid 19’, vs just 3 unvaccinated.
And in the first 15 days after the third shot, 188 vaccinated people died ‘from Covid 19’, vs 7 unvaccinated.
Again, this is just playing a straight bat, assuming that when people go into hospital they are actually being given the best type of care designed to actually save their life. (Big if….)
Let’s leave this here, for today, with a plea:
Please, please, move past the fear of being ostracised, or the fear of upsetting people, or the fear of being different, and start to send this stuff around to as many people as you can.
We are literally racing the clock here, to get awareness of what is really going on in Israel with these Pfizer shots, and everything else it’s connected to, out to as many people as possible – while we can still do something to derail it.
That 5G lamp-post is also scheduled to show up on YOUR doorstep anytime soon.
Shot number 4 (and 5, 6, 7, 8….five million) is already being prepared for the unsuspecting masses.
And each additional shot of this poison that’s given leads to exponentially more people dying, and more people experiencing terrible health issues.
So, be brave, and get this stuff – especially the video – out there.
It’s time to take a stand where it really counts – with your friends and family.
You might also like this article: